Virginia Rhodes
Ryan Harvey
Darren Moskovitz
Not all performance creates value, and not all motion deserves to be rewarded.
In this episode of The Executive Compensation Podcast, Virginia Rhodes, Ryan Harvey and Darren Moskovitz examine one of the most important distinctions in incentive design: the difference between management activity and outcomes that create durable business value.
The discussion explores why companies often gravitate toward measures that are easy to track, how activity-based goals can create the appearance of rigor without necessarily reflecting value creation, and when strategic milestones may still deserve a place in an incentive plan. The hosts also consider leading versus lagging indicators, delayed outcomes, transformation periods, market practice, disclosure pressure and the role of committee judgment when value cannot be measured neatly.
Key Takeaways
• How to distinguish management activity from meaningful value creation
• Why easily measured goals are not always the most important goals
• When activity-based measures may still be appropriate
• How boards can evaluate delayed or long-term outcomes
• The role of leading indicators as data capabilities improve
• How market practice can inform incentive design without controlling it
• What committees should ask before rewarding progress rather than results
The strongest incentive plans do not reward movement for its own sake. They reward the outcomes that matter.
Whether you are a compensation committee member, director, executive or HR leader, this episode offers practical perspectives on designing incentive plans that balance measurable progress, strategic judgment and long-term value creation.
Listen on:
Watch now: